REFRIGERANT RULES: HOW NOT TO GET ZAPPED BY PROPOSED CHANGES
by Robert Johnson
Refrigerant management requirements are likely to become even stricter. Are you and your customers ready?
T
he U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed new rules and
record-keeping requirements that add to those already in effect concerning
servicing, maintaining, repairing, or disposing of air conditioning or
refrigeration equipment (Section 608 of the Clean Air Act).
The
EPA now requires all owners/operators of air conditioning and refrigeration
equipment containing more than 50 lbs. of refrigerant to establish and maintain
detailed records of all refrigerant usage and any service work performed, even
if contractors are used.
Under
the proposed rules, allowable refrigerant leak rates will become more stringent
on systems installed after 1992. Additionally, the EPA proposes, in general,
owners must either repair leaks within 30 days from the date the leak was
discovered or develop a dated retrofit-retirement plan within 39 days and
complete actions under that plan within one year from the plan's date. However,
for industrial process chillers additional time may be available.
If,
after the new rules take effect, owners choose to retrofit or retire a leaking
process chiller, a plan must be developed within 30 days of detecting the leak,
and a copy of the plan must be kept on site.
Industrial
process refrigeration is common in chemical, pharmaceutical, petrochemical, and
manufacturing industries. When systems such as these go down, production losses
can be staggering -- exceeding even the replacement cost of the refrigeration
system.
Industrial
engineers know well the importance of maintaining critical process chillers.
Once these new rules take effect, industrial process chiller owners will have
additional reasons for practicing more frequent chiller inspections in addition
to routine preventive maintenance. The regulatory compliance burden will
increase as well.
The
gravity of a violation is determined by examining the potential environmental
harm, the risk of (or actual) refrigerant loss and the extent of deviation from
the regulations. In addition, other factors not directly related to the
violation can affect the penalty assessment. These include good faith efforts to
comply, previous violations, and/or payment of any previously assessed penalties
for earlier violations.
Today,
surprise inspections are conducted routinely by the EPA, to determine
noncompliance. Failure to comply can result in fines up to $27,500 per day per
violation. Submission of false or misleading information may result in criminal
penalties, including imprisonment.
You
needn't wait for the new rules to be implemented -- planning and preparing for
enforcement inspections and helping your customers prepare for a possible EPA
visit is essential now.
Review
the EPA Final Rule Summary to ensure that yours or your customer's facility
adheres to the current refrigerant regulations. Get a copy of the EPA Section
114A letter, which details some of the records the EPA may ask for. Keep in
mind, records must be made available to the EPA for inspection upon request.
If
an EPA inspection is scheduled or anticipated, try to determine beforehand the
purpose, scope and specific objectives of it.If a customer has operating
personnel, form a team of people knowledgeable in the area of concern. This team
should review refrigerant-related environmental activities at the facility, look
for non-compliant conditions and correct any deficiencies as quickly as
possible.
During
the inspection, obtain a copy of the EPA's internal checklist and examine it for
topics that apply to the facility. In most cases, the inspectors can provide a
copy of this questionnaire.
If
you don't already have the information, ask the inspectors to explain the
purpose, scope, and objectives of the inspection and give them a briefing on the
current state of compliance.
There
are three parts to the EPA inspection:
1.
Staff interviews. The inspectors want to know the team's job
descriptions, how well-trained and qualified they are, and how well they
understand the environmental regulations
2.
Facility tour. Inspectors use the facility tour to get an impression of
compliance and to determine where they should concentrate their efforts.
3.
Records review. Review all records beforehand and be prepared to
submit copies to the inspectors when they request them.
After
the staff interviews, records review, and facility tour, inspectors will conduct
a closing meeting to review their findings. Make note of the findings, and if
possible, offer to make on-the-spot corrections. Try to settle all questions
with the inspectors at this time. If there's a disagreement with a finding,
challenge the finding, not the inspector or the regulation.
Confirm
any deadlines set by the inspector for correcting deficiencies. Expect a
follow-up visit if there were any deficiencies to be corrected.
To
comply with the law concerning refrigerant management, every company should
designate an individual responsible for compliance. The EPA recommends that
every company designate a facility refrigerant manager and implement a
refrigerant management plan. The refrigerant manager should have clear authority
and the necessary budget to implement an appropriate refrigerant management
plan.
|
CURRENT
AND PROPOSED |
|||
|
System Types |
Current Rate |
Pre-1992 |
1992 or Later |
|
Industrial Process Refrigeration |
35% |
35% |
20% |
|
Comfort Cooling |
15% |
10% |
10% |
Principle
duties of the facility refrigerant manager should be to:
The
facility refrigerant manager should have the authority to procure:
The
facility refrigerant manager develops specific administrative controls over
refrigerant management, disposal, equipment repairs and maintenance, and
compliance to all federal, state and local regulations.
You
or your customer should implement additional administrative controls including
those associated with keeping records. A process must be defined to determine if
the individual pieces of equipment with more than 50 lbs. of refrigerant are
exceeding the allowable leak rate limit.
The
EPA can require submission of detailed reports of refrigerant usage, service,
maintenance, and disposal. A computerized refrigerant tracking and reporting
program can help you effectively organize all refrigerant use and ensure
compliance with EPA requirements.
Implementing
these policies and procedures requires company wide coordination, effective
communication, and detailed training programs.
One
method of assuring compliance and minimizing risks during an EPA inspection is
to perform a refrigerant environmental survey. It will help evaluate and
benchmark the current situation and assist in developing a new refrigerant
management plan or improving an existing one.
The
completed survey report should include:
You
can find all of these essential documents, including an EPA compliance checklist
on the website of Environmental Support Solutions at http://www.environ.com.
Robert Johnson, is co-founder and principal
of Environmental Support Solutions (ESS), Mesa, AZ. The firm provides training,
refrigerant site surveys, refrigerant management consulting, and refrigerant
record keeping software to HVAC contractors and facility managers. He can be
reached at 800/289-6116 or at info@environ.com.
Source: Contracting Business Magazine - Website
Article